3He-rich solar energetic particle events observed close to the Sun on Solar Orbiter

    (Solar Orbiter nugget #12 by G. M. Mason1, R. Bučik2, and the Solar Orbiter/EPD team)

     

    Introduction

    Solar energetic particle (SEP) events are studied intensively since they can fill the inner solar system with ionizing radiation and are the most energetic particle accelerators in the solar system.  The Solar Orbiter mission [1] is providing opportunities for better understanding of how these events accelerate and release particles into the interplanetary space, and how they are transported in the solar system. The most abundant SEP events are small “impulsive” events that take place by the thousands in active periods, and show unique properties such as high electron abundances, radio bursts, and ions with abundance mixtures greatly modified from solar material [2, 3]. 

     

    The Solar Orbiter perihelion pass of March-April 2022

    In March 2022, Solar Orbiter had its 4th perihelion flyby, reaching 0.32 of the Earth-Sun distance (au) on March 26. During this pass the Energetic Particle Detector suite [4] observed two series of 3He-rich events. 

    Figure 1.  Solar Orbiter locations when the events were observed in March 2022.  The radial distance was 0.55 au for the series of events starting March 3, and 0.37 au for the series starting March 18.  Earth is located at 0 degrees in the figure. 

     

    On March 3 the first series began, originating in a magnetic active region (AR 12957) located on the western hemisphere of the Sun as viewed from Earth. A strong injection of particles on March 3 can be seen at the left in Figure 2. 

    Figure 2: energetic ion intensities March 3-7; top panel are intensity levels of H, He, and other ions; middle panel show ion masses up to Fe, and lower panel shows ion arrival times

    Close inspection reveals two separate injections shown with dashed red lines, and numbered 1 and 2 in coincidence with radio bursts shown in Figure 3. 

    Figure 3, top panel: type III radio bursts on March 3; middle panel magnetic active region with jets at the time of the energetic particle event; bottom panel: details of magnetic field in the active region.

     

    The second radio burst starting around 14:16 moves from high to lower frequencies due to plasma waves excited by energetic electrons escaping the Sun and moving into interplanetary space where the wave frequencies are lower since the plasma density decreases at greater distances from the Sun. This middle panel of Fig. 3 shows two bright loops and jets, as is shown in the movie below, which are the source of event #2. 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    The magnetic configuration (lower panel of Figure 3) and jet activity are consistent with the model of reconnecting magnetic fields due to emerging flux emanating from below the surface [5, 6, 7].  Other events in the series shown in Figure 2 all showed enrichments in 3He but with interesting differences that may give clues to the accelerating process.  Event #5 had the highest intensities and its associated jet was almost twice the size of the jet in #2.  The other events (#1, #3, #4, #6) all had lower intensities and smaller brightening and minor jets.  This is consistent with the suggestion that larger acceleration regions produce larger events [8].  Other features of these regions (see the A&A special issue) showed a network of crisscrossing loops that may correspond to the simulated turbulent magnetic coronal structures that may enhance acceleration is impulsive flares [9,10].

     

    The second series of events was observed on March 18-19 when Solar Orbiter had moved much closer to the Sun, 0.37 au.  A series of very closely spaced events took place, with about 15 injections in less than 24 hours.  Figure 4 shows the speed arrival times, where the different ion injections are numbered, and dotted lines guide the eye to show correspondence with the arrival of electrons at Solar Orbiter, and radio type III bursts observed by the Solar Orbiter Radio  and Plasma Waves (RPW) experiment [11].

     

    Figure 4: top panel: 10-70 amu 1/speed vs arrival time for the March 18-19 series. Middle panel: electron spectrograms at Solar Orbiter. Bottom panel: type III radio bursts.  Note the close correspondence between the 15 events and radio bursts.  

     

    Although there was X-ray activity during this time, the event timing (red arrows at the top of Fig. 4) did not line up well with the particle events.  Rather, a small loop to the west of the active region shown in Figure 5 was found to the flaring in close coincidence with several of the events.

    Figure 5: SDO 94 Å (~7-9 MK temperature) image of a small loop to the right of the active region that flared in coincidence with several of the events, as shown in the accompanying movie.  

    The movie below shows the flaring loop and type III bursts in coincidence:

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    At this close distance the electrons arrive at Solar Orbiter in just a few minutes so the coincidence between the type III  bursts, electrons, and loop flaring have much smaller uncertainties than events viewed further from the Sun.  The loop appears to be the source of the energetic ions since the timing coincidence is close and there does not appear to be other activity at the time. There is no obvious coronal hole as was the case for the March 3-7 series, yet the particle escape establishes that there were some open field lines nearby. 

     

    Conclusions

    Superficially, the events in the March 3-7 series, with jets, coronal holes and active region involvement present a seemingly incompatible picture with the March 18-19 series, with a small flaring loop, no obvious jets or coronal holes, and away from a nearby active region. We take these differences as evidence that the processes that produce type III and 3He-rich events can arise in multiple situations in the corona and are widespread.  This is consistent with the presence of 3He in interplanetary space 90-100% of the time during active periods [12]. Thus the events observed during the Solar Orbiter perihelion pass may provide insights into the essential features of the mechanism (emerging flux, reconnection) as opposed to other phenomena that are not actually required (x-ray flares, active region eruptions). 

    For more details see the associated papers in A&A special issue [13,14].

    Acknowledgements

    The EPD team acknowledges support for post-launch work at JHU/APL by by NASA contract NNN06AA01C and at CAU by German Space Agency (DLR) grant # 50OT2002. The UAH team acknowledges the financial support by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades MCIU/AEI Project PID2019- 104863RBI00/AEI/10.13039/501100011033.  The EPD Suprathermal Ion Spectrograph (SIS) is a European facility instrument funded by ESA under contract number SOL.ASTR.CON.00004.  We thank ESA and NASA for their support of the Solar Orbiter and other missions whose data were used in this report. 

     

    Affiliations

    1 Applied Physics Laboratory, Johns Hopkins University, Laurel, MD 20723 USA

    2 Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX 78238, USA

     

    References

    [1] Müller, D., Cyr, O. C. S., Zouganelis, I., Gilbert, H. E. & Marsden, R. The Solar Orbiter mission - Science overview. Astron. & Astrophys. 642, A1 (2020).

    [2] Desai, M. & Giacalone, J. Large gradual solar energetic particle events. Living Reviews in Solar Physics 13, 3 (2016).

    [3] Reames, D. V. Abundances, Ionization States, Temperatures, and FIP in Solar Energetic Particles. Space Science Reviews 214, 61 (2018).

    [4] Rodríguez-Pacheco, J. et al. The Energetic Particle Detector - Energetic particle instrument suite for the Solar Orbiter mission. Astron. & Astrophys 642, A7 (2020).

    [5] Shibata, K. et al. Observations of X-ray jets with the YOHKOH Soft X-ray Telescope. PASJ: Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan (ISSN 0004-6264) 44, L173 (1992).

    [6] Shimojo, M. & Shibata, K. Physical Parameters of Solar X-Ray Jets. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series 542, 1100 (2000).

    [7] Wang, Y.-M., Pick, M. & Mason, G. M. Coronal Holes, Jets, and the Origin of 3He-rich Particle Events. Astrophysical Journal 639, 495 (2006).

    [8] Ho, G. C., Roelof, E. C. & Mason, G. M. The Upper Limit on 3He Fluence in Solar Energetic Particle Events. The Astrophysical Journal 621, L141 (2005).

    [9] Dahlin, J. T., Drake, J. F. & Swisdak, M. Electron acceleration in three-dimensional magnetic reconnection with a guide field. Physics of Plasmas 22, 100704 (2015).

    [10] Daughton, W. et al. Role of electron physics in the development of turbulent magnetic reconnection in collisionless plasmas. Nature Physics 7, 539–542 (2011).

    [11] Maksimovic, M., Bale, S. D., Chust, T. & Khotyaintsev, Y. The Solar Orbiter Radio and Plasma Waves (RPW) instrument. Astron. & Astrophys. 642, A12 (2020).

    [12] Wiedenbeck, M. E. et al. How Common is Energetic 3He in the Inner Heliosphere? SOLAR WIND TEN: Proceedings of the Tenth International Solar Wind Conference. AIP Conference Proceedings 679, 652 (2003).

    [13] Mason, G. M. et al. The 18–19 March 2022 series of 3He-rich events observed by Solar Orbiter at 0.36 au compared with EUV, X-ray, and radio observations. Astron & Astrophys 669, L16 (2023).

    [14] Bučík, R. et al. Recurrent 3He-rich solar energetic particle injections observed by Solar Orbiter at ~0.5 au. Astron & Astrophys 673, L5 (2023).