Science nugget: Composition Mosaics from March 2022 - Solar Orbiter
Composition mosaics from March 2022
(Solar Orbiter Nugget #34 by T. Varesano1,2,3, D. M. Hassler2, N. Zambrana Prado4, J. Plowman2, G. Del Zanna5, et al.)
Introduction
The heliosphere, composed of plasma, radiation, dust, and energetic particles, is influenced by the Sun's magnetic activity. Understanding this dynamic medium is essential for grasping its effects on immersed bodies. The Solar Orbiter (SO) mission [1, 2] with its ten remote sensing and in-situ instruments, aims to investigate the solar wind's origin and acceleration. SO will provide unprecedented images of the Sun and insights into its polar regions.
Among its instruments, the Spectral Imaging of the Coronal Environment (SPICE, [3, 4]) spectrometer captures extreme ultraviolet spectra, offering temperature coverage from the chromosphere to the corona. SPICE data can be compared with in-situ measurements from the Solar Wind Analyser [5] (SWA), aiding in understanding solar processes and heliospheric plasma phenomena. Despite known origins of the fast solar wind, the slow solar wind's formation mechanisms remain unclear. SPICE's data will help study the First Ionization Potential (FIP) effect [6], which is the enhancing of low-FIP elements (ionization energy under 10eV) in the corona. We focus our analysis on SPICE's first composition mosaic, taken on March 2, 2022 from 00:41 to 23:30 UTC while SO was very close to its first perihelion, at around a heliocentric distance of 0.54 AU. SPICE caught two active regions (AR 12957 and AR 12958, see Figure 1 with the HMI and AIA data) in its field of view. We provide details on data and results, FIP-bias measurements, and future observation plans, building on previous methodologies for interpreting SPICE data.
Figure 1: Active Regions 12958 (a) and 12957 (b) observed on March 2nd, 2022 at 20:24 UT by SDO/AIA imager at 171 Å (representing the corona at 0.6MK), lower panel and corresponding SDO/HMI images observed on March 2nd, 2022 at 18:58 UT, upper panel. White/black areas are of positive/negative polarity.
SPICE radiance maps
We extracted radiance maps from the spectra provided by SPICE, which are the first steps to any of our diagnostics. Two wavelength ranges are observed with SPICE: 703 to 790 Å with the SW (short wavelength) detector, and 973 to 1049 Å with the LW (long wavelength) detector. Thanks to SPICE’s large temperature coverage (from 10k to 1M Kelvin), processes from the solar surface to the low corona can be observed. SPICE has a good coverage of the chromospheric region, including lines like O III 703 Å, N III 991 Å, transition region (N IV 765 Å, O VI 1032 Å) and up to the low corona (Ne VIII 770 Å, Mg IX 706 Å).
The radiance maps showed good agreement with higher resolution images from the Extreme Ultra-Violet (EUI) instrument, even in quieter solar regions and coronal holes (see Figure 2).
Figure 2: Radiance maps superimposed on EUI/FSI images
Linear Combination Ratio method applied to SPICE data
After checking the accuracy of these radiance maps, we move on to plasma diagnostics. We use the First Ionization Potential (FIP) bias as a measure of whether the plasma shows a coronal or a photospheric composition. In order to measure the FIP bias (ratio of coronal to photospheric abundance), we use the Linear Combination Ratio (LCR) [7]. This method consists of using an optimized linear combination of spectroscopic lines of both low-FIP and high-FIP elements so that the ratio of the corresponding radiances yields the relative FIP bias. In this study, we used the sulfur (S) element as our low-FIP and nitrogen (N) as our high-FIP element.
This allows us to investigate the mechanisms responsible for the formation and acceleration of the solar wind. From the in-situ data, a proxy of the FIP (Fe/O abundance) and the ionization level and electron temperature of the solar wind (using the O6+/O7+ ratio) can be retrieved [8]. That way, we can trace back the fractionation and the type of solar wind observed both at the surface and at the spacecraft.
Results
We found higher FIP bias values at the footpoints of the loops, indicating that fractionation occurs – even at lower heights below the corona and in the transition region – using sulfur and nitrogen diagnostics. The behavior of the element sulfur is especially interesting because it lies in the “intermediate-FIP” category, meaning that it does not always behave as a high-FIP nor as a low-FIP element. Rather, its behavior depends on the geometry of the magnetic field [9] . From our observations, sulfur behaves as a high-FIP element in closed magnetic loops, but as a low-FIP in the solar wind (open field).
Conclusion
Future work aims to compare in-situ and remote-sensing data to understand changes in elemental abundances, velocity, and ionization levels. Sulfur, behaving differently in closed magnetic loops versus the solar wind, may be key to identifying open fields and therefore sources of the solar wind. Indeed, as pointed out in [9] and in [10], intermediate-FIP elements as sulfur behave as high-FIP elements in closed magnetic loops, but behave as low-FIP elements in the solar wind. Moreover, sulfur fractionates only in the low chromosphere where non resonant waves on open field lines occur. Resonant Alfvèn waves can produce sufficient fractionation only in the top part of the chromosphere, since they have most of their energy trapped at higher altitudes, on top of the loops. In these conditions, the fractionation will not be significant, which is what we observe in our S/O ratio.
The interpretation of the behavior of sulfur in remote-sensing observations might be more complex and has to be carefully considered, but will be a crucial variable to understand the solar wind mechanisms.
Combining in-situ and different EUV spectroscopy data will be crucial for an enhance of the understanding of solar atmospheric dynamics for identifying solar wind sources.
This article has been published with DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347637
Acknowledgements
This work at SwRI for Solar Orbiter SPICE is supported by NASA under GSFC subcontract #80GSFC20C0053 to Southwest Research Institute. The development of the SPICE instrument has been funded by ESA member states and ESA (contract no. SOL.S.ASTR.CON. 00070). The work at GSFC is supported by NASA funding for Solar Orbiter SPICE, and N. Zambrana-Prado is supported by cooperative agreement 80NSSC21M0180. The German contribution to SPICE is funded by the Bundesministerium für Wirtschaft und Technologie through the Deutsches Zentrum für Luft und Raumfahrt e.V. (DLR), grants no. 50 OT 1001/1201/1901. The Swiss hardware contribution was funded through PRODEX by the Swiss Space Office (SSO). The UK hardware contribution was funded by the UK Space Agency. S.L. Yardley would like to thank STFC via the consolidated grant (STFC ST/V000497/1). G. Del Zanna acknowledges support from STFC (UK) via the consolidated grant to the atomic astrophysics group at DAMTP, University of Cambridge (ST/T000481/1). Python modules used for this work include numpy, matplotlib, astropy, sunpy, scipy, sospice, EMToolKiT and cblind.
Affiliations
1 Institut National Polytechnique de Grenoble, 38000 Grenoble, France
2 Southwest Research Institute, Boulder, CO 80302, USA
3 Department of Aerospace Engineering Sciences, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO, USA
4 NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD, USA
5 DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, UK
References
[1] Müller, D., St. Cyr, O. C., Zouganelis, I., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A1 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038467
[2] García Marirrodriga, C., Pacros, A., Strandmoe, S., et al. 2021, A&A, 646, A121 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202038519
[3] SPICE Consortium, Anderson, M., Appourchaux, T., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A14 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201935574
[4] Fludra, A., Caldwell, M., Giunta, A., et al. 2021, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 656, A38 https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202141221
[5] Owen, C. J., Bruno, R., Livi, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 642, A16, https://doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201937259
[6] Von Steiger, R., Geiss, J., & Gloeckler, G. 1997, in Cosmic Winds and the Heliosphere, eds. J. R. Jokipii, C. P. Sonett, & M. S. Giampapa, 581 https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt1zxsmpd
[7] Zambrana-Prado, N., & Buchlin, E.2019, A&A, 632, A20 https://www.aanda.org/articles/aa/pdf/2019/12/aa34735-18.pdf
[8] Ogilvie, K. W. 1985, J. Geophys. Res., 90(A10), 9881–9884, https://doi.org/10.1029/JA090iA10p09881
[9] Laming, J.M., Vourlidas, A., Korendyke, C., et al. 2019,ApJ,879,124 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab23f1
[10] Kuroda,N.,&Laming,J.M.2020,ApJ,895,36 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.3847/1538-4357/ab8870
Nuggets archive
2024
25/09/2024: All microflares that accelerate electrons to high-energies are rooted in sunspots
25/09/2024: Connecting Solar Orbiter and L1 measurements of mesoscale solar wind structures to their coronal source using the Adapt-WSA model
18/09/2024: Modelling the global structure of a coronal mass ejection observed by Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe
28/08/2024: Coordinated observations with the Swedish 1m Solar Telescope and Solar Orbiter
21/08/2024: Multi-source connectivity drives heliospheric solar wind variability
14/08/2024: Composition Mosaics from March 2022
19/06/2024: Coordinated Coronal and Heliospheric Observations During the 2024 Total Solar Eclipse
22/05/2024: Real time space weather prediction with Solar Orbiter
15/05/2024: Hard X ray and microwave pulsations: a signature of the flare energy release process
01/02/2024: Relativistic electrons accelerated by an interplanetary shock wave
11/01/2024: Modelling Two Consecutive Energetic Storm Particle Events observed by Solar Orbiter
2023
14/12/2023: Understanding STIX hard X-ray source motions using field extrapolations
16/11/2023: EUI data reveal a "steady" mode of coronal heating
09/11/2023: A new solution to the ambiguity problem
02/11/2023: Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe jointly take a step forward in understanding coronal heating
25/10/2023: Observations of mini coronal dimmings caused by small-scale eruptions in the quiet Sun
18/10/2023: Fleeting small-scale surface magnetic fields build the quiet-Sun corona
27/09/2023: Solar Orbiter reveals non-field-aligned solar wind proton beams and its role in wave growth activities
20/09/2023: Polarisation of decayless kink oscillations of solar coronal loops
23/08/2023: A sharp EUI and SPICE look into the EUV variability and fine-scale structure associated with coronal rain
02/08/2023: Solar Flare Hard Xrays from the anchor points of an eruptive filament
28/06/2023: 3He-rich solar energetic particle events observed close to the Sun on Solar Orbiter
14/06/2023: Observational Evidence of S-web Source of Slow Solar Wind
31/05/2023: An interesting interplanetary shock
24/05/2023: High-resolution imaging of coronal mass ejections from SoloHI
17/05/2023: Direct assessment of far-side helioseismology using SO/PHI magnetograms
10/05/2023: Measuring the nascent solar wind outflow velocities via the doppler dimming technique
26/04/2023: Imaging and spectroscopic observations of EUV brightenings using SPICE and EUI on board Solar Orbiter
19/04/2023: Hot X-ray onset observations in solar flares with Solar Orbiter/STIX
12/04/2023: Multi-scale structure and composition of ICME prominence material from the Solar Wind Analyser suite
22/03/2023: Langmuir waves associated with magnetic holes in the solar wind
15/03/2023: Radial dependence of the peak intensity of solar energetic electron events in the inner heliosphere
08/03/2023: New insights about EUV brightenings in the quiet sun corona from the Extreme Ultraviolet Imager