Multi-scale structure and composition of icme prominence material from the solar wind analyser suite

(Solar Orbiter nugget #4 by Ryan M. Dewey¹, 

Susan T. Lepri¹, Stefano Livi^1,2, Christopher J. Owen³, Philippe Louarn⁴, Raffaella D’Amicis⁵, and the Solar Orbiter/SWA team)

Introduction

Measurements of heavy ion composition in the solar wind can be leveraged to both identify interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs) as well as extract information about the origin, release, and structure of these events. Observed remotely, coronal mass ejections at the Sun usually exhibit a characteristic three-part structure: a bright leading edge of highly ionized plasma, a low-density magnetically dominated cavity, and an embedded dense cold core associated with a solar prominence [1,2]. The coronal processes that create this spatial structure impart specific signatures in the plasma composition related to their varying thermal and density structure. The extreme energy release and heating of coronal plasma associated with eruption ionize the local plasma to elevated charge states (e.g., Fe¹⁶⁺) compared to the typical solar wind (Fe^8–12+) [e.g., 3-5]. Conversely, prominence plasma originates from deeper in the solar atmosphere where cooler temperatures and denser material result in low-charge material (e.g., Fe²⁺) [6,7]. When observed in situ in the heliosphere, ICMEs often possess a magnetic cloud structure led by a density pileup and are associated with changes in plasma composition compared to the surrounding solar wind [e.g., 8,9]. However, while high-charge-state material is commonly observed within ICMEs [10], low-charge-state material is only rarely measured. A survey spanning over a decade of observations near Earth found only ~4% of ICMEs contained this low-charge prominence plasma [11].

Reconciling the differences in structure inferred from remote CME and in situ ICME measurements remains an observational and theoretical challenge. The low-charge-state material is expected to survive the eruption and be ejected into interplanetary space in or about the ICME [12,13]. However, remote observations of the prominence eruptions suggest that this material fills only a small fraction of the ICME [14] or that it fragments [15] such that the chance of observing this plasma in situ in the heliosphere is low. Furthermore, evolution of the ICME and its contents may contribute to differences in the remote and in situ observation. Magnetic reconnection between an ICME and the surrounding solar wind, for example, may dilute the low-charge material by changing magnetic topology to allow different plasma populations to mix [e.g., 16]. The Solar Orbiter mission [17] delivers new insight into the occurrence and characteristics of prominence plasma within ICMEs by providing dedicated plasma composition measurements at unprecedented resolution in the inner heliosphere.

Observations

The Solar Wind Analyser instrument suite [18] on Solar Orbiter recorded a short interval of prominence plasma during a series of ICMEs that passed over the spacecraft during late October to early November 2021. The suite includes three separate sensors: the Proton-Alpha System (PAS) that measures characteristics of the abundant proton and alpha ions; the Heavy Ion Sensor (HIS) that measures plasma composition via characteristics of minor heavy ion species; and the Electron Analyser System (EAS) that measures characteristics of solar wind electron populations. Measurements from the three sensors and the magnetometer [19] over a 7.5-day period are presented in Figure 1 and show the passage of two ICMEs with sharply contrasting features. The second event displays more typical in situ signatures, including a low-density flux rope with elevated carbon, oxygen, and iron charge states. However, the first ICME contains a short interval dominated by dense low-charge plasma (orange interval).

Figure 1. Solar Orbiter time series of the late October to early November 2021 ICMEs. PAS proton (a) density, (b) speed, and (c) temperature. HIS (d) carbon charge state distribution, (e) oxygen charge state distribution, (f) iron charge state distribution, (g) O⁷⁺/O⁶⁺ ratio (red) and C⁶⁺/C⁵⁺ ratio (blue), (h) Fe/O abundance ratio using Fe^6-20+ and O^5-8+. EAS (i) electron strahl pitch angle distribution. MAG (j) field strength (black) and vector components (RTN in red, green, and blue, respectively). Vertical lines indicate specific features of the ICMEs.

Despite the short duration of this prominence interval compared to the duration of the ICMEs, the SWA suite highlights the detail of its structure over a range of spatiotemporal scales in Figure 2. Bracketed by orange lines, the high-density low-charge material lasts for only 36 minutes and is embedded within a large-scale magnetic rotation. Within the prominence interval, distinct changes in the electron strahl pitch angle measured by EAS divide the interval into fourteen segments ranging from <30 seconds to several minutes in duration. These segments, bounded by the vertical black lines, are associated with small-scale rotations in the magnetic field and changes in the plasma characteristics. The fast time resolution of PAS and HIS, at 4 and 30 seconds respectively, capture fine structures in the bulk properties and plasma composition. Each of the low-charge species (H⁺, He⁺, He²⁺, C⁺, O⁺, and Fe^1-4+) share similar large-scale spatiotemporal structure (enhancements at both the beginning and end of the interval) but exhibit individual behavior about the small-scale magnetic field structures. Highly ionized species (C⁶⁺, O⁶⁺, Fe^8-12+, and Fe^14-20+) are persistent throughout the interval but are anti-correlated with the low-charge material, showing depletions during both low-charge enhancements. The multi-scale structure evident within the plasma and magnetic field, the anticorrelation between low- and high-charge species abundance, and the small amount of low-charge plasma outside the main interval suggest gradual loss of the low-charge material from, and entry of the high-charge plasma into, the magnetic structures. Mixing of these populations more likely occurred during transit rather than during eruption.

Figure 2. Detailed structure of the prominence interval. PAS (a-b) speed, (c) temperature, (d) H⁺ density, (e) He⁺(black) and He²⁺ (red) densities. HIS count rates for: (f) C⁺ (black) and C⁶⁺ (red); (g) O⁺ (black) and O⁶⁺ (red); and (h) Fe^1-4+ (black), Fe^8-12+ (blue), Fe^14-20+ (red). EAS (i) electron strahl pitch angle distribution. MAG (j-l) magnetic field RTN components, with faint gray indicating ±|B|.

Conclusions

Observations of interplanetary prominence material are rare and present unique opportunities to study ICME formation, eruption, internal structure, and evolution. These in situ Solar Orbiter plasma measurements from SWA provide significant improvements over earlier data sets – in particular, the composition observations are unparalleled in their temporal and species resolution. HIS operates over an order of magnitude faster than previous similar instruments, allowing it to record the fine structure of the prominence interval. Previously flown instruments would have recorded the entire interval as a single measurement [20]. Taken together, the small, inhomogeneous spatiotemporal structure of the prominence plasma, low-charge plasma confinement and leakage, and high-charge plasma entry are consistent with fragmentation of the prominence plasma near the Sun. Additional events captured by the Solar Wind Analyser suite on Solar Orbiter in future will reveal the frequency of this process.

These observations, alongside additional compositional analysis and comparison with spacecraft measurements of these ICMEs near Earth, are being prepared for publication.

Affiliations:

¹University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

²Southwest Research Institute, San Antonio, TX, USA

³Mullard Space Science Laboratory, University College London, Holmbury St. Mary, UK

⁴Laboratoire de Physique des Plasmas, Ecole Polytechnique, Palaiseau, France

⁵INAF-Istituto di Astrofisica e Planetologia Spaziali, Roma, Italy

References

[1] Lynch B. J., et al. (2004). Observable Properties of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejections. The Astrophysical Journal

[2] Low, B. C. (1994). Magnetohydrodynamic processes in the solar corona: Flares, coronal mass ejections, and magnetic helicity. Physics of Plasmas

[3] Rakowksi, C. E., et al. (2007). Ion Charge States in Halo Coronal Mass Ejections: What Can We Learn about the Explosion? The Astrophysical Journal

[4] Lynch, B. J., et al. (2011). Ionic Composition Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections in Axisymmetric Magnetohydrodynamic Models. The Astrophysical Journal

[5] Landi, E., et al. (2010). Physical Conditions in a Coronal Mass Ejection from Hinode, Stereo, and SOHO Observations. The Astrophysical Journal

[6] Parenti, S. (2014). Solar Prominences: Observations. Living Reviews in Solar Physics

[7] Lepri, S. T., and Zurbuchen, T. H. (2010). Direct Observational Evidence of Filament Material Within Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections. The Astrophysical Journal Letters

[8] Richardson, I. G., and Cane, H. V. (2010). Near-Earth Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections During Solar Cycle 23 (1996 - 2009): Catalog and Summary of Properties. Solar Physics

[9] Zurbuchen, T. H., et al. (2016). Composition of Coronal Mass Ejections. The Astrophysical Journal

[10] Lepri, S. T., et al., (2001). Iron charge distribution as an identifier of interplanetary coronal mass ejections. Journal of Geophysical Research

[11] Lepri, S. T., and Rivera, Y. J. (2021). Elemental Abundances of Prominence Material inside ICMEs. The Astrophysical Journal

[12] Gruesbeck, J. R., et al. (2012). Two-plasma Model for Low Charge State Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejection Observations. The Astrophysical Journal

[13] Rivera, Y., J., et al. (2019). Empirical Modeling of CME Evolution Constrained to ACE/SWICS Charge State Distributions. The Astrophysical Journal

[14] Lee, J.-Y., and Raymond, J. C. (2012). Low Ionization State Plasma in Coronal Mass Ejections. The Astrophysical Journal

[15] Wood, B. E., et al. (2016). Imaging prominence eruptions out to 1 AU. The Astrophysical Journal

[16] Manchester, W. B., et al. (2017). The physical processes of CME/ICME evolution. Space Science Reviews

[17] Müller, D., et al. (2020). The Solar Orbiter mission. A&A

[18] Owen, C., et al. (2020). The Solar Orbiter Solar Wind Analyser (SWA) suite. A&A

[19] Horbury, T., et al. (2020). The Solar Orbiter magnetometer. A&A

[20] Gloeckler, G., et al. (1998). Investigation of the composition of solar and interstellar matter using solar wind and pickup ion measurements with SWICS and SWIMS on the ACE spacecraft. Space Science Reviews